Piecewise polynomial regression trees
By Probal Chaudhuri, Min-Ching Huang, W. Loh, Ruji Yao. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Susan Athey
- Wei-Yin Loh
- Cynthia Rudin
- Stefan Wager
- Hugh A. Chipman
- Thomas Rusch
- Edward I. George
- Elena Ikonomovska
Citations in the corpus
- Toward Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning with Linear Model U-Trees (2018, background): “than simple constants. Being strictly more expressive than a regression tree, a linear model tree can also approximate a continuous function arbitrarily closely, with typically with many fewer leaves [4]. Smaller trees are more interpretable, and therefore more suitable for mimic learning. As shown ”
- Supervised Neighborhoods for Distributed Nonparametric Regression (2016, methodology): “, tree-based piecewise polynomials models [13], and multivariate adaptive regression splines [14].”
- Semiconvex Regression for Metamodeling-Based Optimization (2014, methodology): “1 is similar to Theorem 1 of [19]; to prove our theorem, we modify parts of the proof in [19] that rely on a fixed number of polyhedral faces and account for the error introduced through the varying-coefficient model.”
- Regression trees for longitudinal and multiresponse data (2012, background): “The conditions generalize those for univariate responses in Chaudhuri et al. (1994, 1995), Chaudhuri and Loh (2002) and Kim et al. (2007).”
- Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees (2014, background): “Smoothed and Unsmoothed Piecewise POlynomial Regression Trees (SUPPORT) (Chaudhuri et al., 1994) uses a different approach that applies classification tree techniques to the residuals.”
- Multivariate convex regression with adaptive partitioning (2011, methodology): “Algorithmic methods for solving the quadratic program were given in Wu (1982), Dykstra (1983) and Fraser & Massam (1989).”
- Learning model trees from evolving data streams (2010, methodology): “The RA splitting rule comes from SUPPORT (Chaudhuri et al. 1994).”
- Gaining insight with recursive partitioning of generalized linear models (2013, methodology): “Furthermore, MOB provides functionality for many different type of node models that even exceeds the versatility of SUPPORT and GUIDE.”
- REGRESSION TREES WITH UNBIASED VARIABLE SELECTION AND INTERACTION DETECTION (2002, methodology): “Chaudhuri et al. (1994) use the data to illustrate the SUPPORT method.”
- Expert Systems With Applications (unknown): “…reduction by predicting of mean output values in two child nodes ( Breiman et al., 1984; Quinlan, 1992; Wang & Witten, 1997 ), or examining distribution of sample deviations from fitting one linear regression function to all the samples in the parent node ( Chaudhuri et al., 1994; Loh, 2002 ).”
- Visualizable and interpretable regression models with good prediction power (2007, unknown): “Now, following the ideas in the proof of Theorem 1 in Chaudhuri, Huang, Loh and Yao (1994) ,”
- Bayesian Treed Generalized Linear Models (2003, methodology): “Several papers have suggested such a strategy: Karali‚c (1992) for multiple regression models, Alexander and Grimshaw (1996) for simple linear regression models, and Chaudhuri, Huang, Loh and Yao (1994) for multiple polynomial regression models.”