Validity of the reduced version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire

By Vincenzo Natale, M. Esposito, M. Martoni, M. Fabbri. 2006

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3029833d9692e241ed7871b9dc94e0d1b875147

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ståle Pallesen
2. Christoph Randler
3. Ioannis Tsaousis
4. Gerald Matthews
5. M. Ledzińska
6. M. Stolarski

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ståle Pallesen
2. Christoph Randler
3. Mark D. Griffiths

Citations in the corpus

• An Actigraphic Validation Study of Seven Morningness- Eveningness Inventories (2012, result): “In two studies, an ME questionnaire investigated students wearing actigraphs for three consecutive nights, and both studies showed an earlier physical activity phase in morning types compared to evening types (Natale, Esposito, Martoni, & Fabbri, 2006; Natale et al., 2006).”
• Validation of the full and reduced Composite Scale of Morningness (2009, methodology): “Concerning the short forms, the validity of the rMEQ is widely accepted by previous validation studies (e.g. Natale et al. 2006), while any form of the rCSM has not yet been tested and validated externally; further it does not seem to be widely used.”