Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots

By Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, M. Imai, T. Ono. 2004

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Robotics & Control

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Kazuyoshi Wada
2. Takanori Shibata
3. Maja J. Mataric
4. George Chryssolouris
5. Sotiris Makris
6. Panagiota Tsarouchi

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Kazuyoshi Wada
2. Takanori Shibata
3. David Feil-Seifer
4. Thierry Chaminade
5. Maja J. Mataric
6. George Chryssolouris
7. Sotiris Makris
8. Panagiota Tsarouchi

In Social Psychology

1. Maja J. Mataric
2. Thierry Chaminade
3. Kazuyoshi Wada
4. Takanori Shibata
5. David Feil-Seifer
6. ChrisD . Frith
7. Jon Driver
8. Hiroshi Ishiguro

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Kazuyoshi Wada
2. Takanori Shibata
3. Hiroshi Ishiguro

In Robotics & Control

1. Kazuyoshi Wada
2. Takanori Shibata
3. George Chryssolouris
4. Sotiris Makris
5. Panagiota Tsarouchi
6. Liviu Panait
7. Sean Luke
8. Dongbing Gu

Citations in the corpus

• The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions (2011, background): “Humanoid robots and artificial agents are increasingly part of our daily lives (Kanda et al., 2004; Dautenhahn, 2007; Tapus et al., 2007).”
• Human–robot interaction review and challenges on task planning and programming (2016, background): “The series of the Robovie humanoid robots was developed focusing on becoming partners with humans, by utilising tactile feedback (Kanda et al. 2004).”
• Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House (2007, methodology): “A new character robot Kismet [13] and the anthropologic robot Robovie [14] have been developed to study human–robot communication .”
• Defining socially assistive robotics (2005, background): “Furthermore, for physical therapy, recognizing body position is vital and can enhance the interaction between the robot and the user [22].”