Methods for the detection and analysis of protein–protein interactions
By T. Berggård, S. Linse, P. James. Proteomics, 2007
656 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2f186f7dc76cd77e0aee46ba8e6d2b4a58b16c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
In Molecular Biology
- Ian Simpson
- Celia Fontanillo
- J. D. Armstrong
- Andrew P Jarman
- Andreas Ruepp
- Subash C. B. Gopinath
- J De Las Rivas
- Giuseppe Gallone
Citations in the corpus
- Protein–Protein Interactions Essentials: Key Concepts to Building and Analyzing Interactome Networks (2010, methodology): “The most often used binary and co-complex methodologies are, respectively, yeast twohybrid (Y2H) [10] and tandem affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (TAP-MS) [11].”
- Biosensing applications of surface plasmon resonance-based Biacore technology (2010, background): “[76] T.”
- Protein-Protein Interaction Detection: Methods and Analysis (2014, background): “It has been revealed that over 80% of proteins do not operate alone but in complexes [6].”
- Bio::Homology::InterologWalk - A Perl module to build putative protein-protein interaction networks through interolog mapping (2011, background): “In an attempt to address the relative paucity of data, a number of computational techniques have been proposed to predict and prioritise PPIs [10,11].”
- CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes—2019 (2018, background): “(2), even more than 80% of proteins work in complexes.”