Central Banking by Committee

By A. Sibert. 2006

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2c4114a87d6d27516e0579a8ad85c28c6a99131

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Christopher Crowe
2. Ellen E. Meade
3. Andréa Stella
4. A. Alesina
5. Barry Eichengreen
6. N. Dinçer

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Christopher Crowe
2. Ellen E. Meade

In Safety Research

1. Christopher Crowe
2. Ellen E. Meade

Citations in the corpus

• The Evolution of Central Bank Governance around the World (2007, background): “Sibert (2006) suggests that the optimal committee size may be about five, yet many monetary policy committees exceed the five members that Blinder and Morgan (2005) used in their experiments.”
• Central Bank Boards Around the World: Why Does Membership Size Differ? (2006, unknown): “As groups increase, however, individual members may have a stronger incentive to “freeride” on the information processing efforts of others, especially if information processing is a costly activity, which will lead to growing inefficiencies (e.g., Sibert 2006).”
• The information content of central bank minutes (2012, unknown): “Surveys of the literature on monetary policy committees are found in, for example, Sibert (2006), Blinder (2007) and Maier (2007).”