Interviewing the Investigator: Strategies for Addressing Instrumentation and Researcher Bias Concerns in Qualitative Research.
By Ronald J. Chenail. 2011
746 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2c0ac75904d13244be318f06fee606c1496d20d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Valerie Tharp Byers
- S. Shelton
- Danon Carter
- Timothy Baghurst
- Patricia Fusch
- Gene E. Fusch
- Lawrence R. Ness
- Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
Citations in the corpus
- Establishing Construct Validity and Reliability: Pilot Testing of a Qualitative Interview for Research in Takaful (Islamic Insurance) (2016, background): “concepts in question from the interviewee’s perspective (Chenail, 2011).”
- An Exemplar for Combining the Collection, Analysis, and Interpretations of Verbal and Nonverbal Data in Qualitative Research (2014, background): “…Data An effective way of assessing the process of meaning making is via what is known as interviewing the (interpretive) researcher (Onwuegbuzie, Leech, & Collins, 2008) or interviewing the investigator (Chenail, 2011)—but more simply known as debriefing interviews (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2008).”
- How to Conduct a Mini-Ethnographic Case Study: A Guide for Novice Researchers (2017, background): “Rather, one mitigates bias as best as one can (Amerson, 2011; Chenail, 2011).”
- Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. (2016, methodology): “Follow-up questions could be pre-designed (Whiting 2008, Rabionet 2010), spontaneous or based on the participant’s answer (Whiting 2008, Turner 2010, Chenail 2011).”
- The Influence of Servant Leadership on Restaurant Employee Engagement (2014, background): “Future research should consider conducting individual interviews which often elicit more meaningful, rich data as interviews are typically one-on-one and participants may feel comfortable giving open feedback (Chenail 2011).”
- Reconceptualizing Bias in Teaching Qualitative Research Methods (2015, background): “” Researchers working from new-paradigm approaches are called upon to be explicit about their subject positions and points of view, and actively manage these through reflexive practices (Chenail, 2011; Finlay, 2002, 2012; Hsiung, 2008; Peshkin, 1988; Preissle, 2008).”