RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity

1,179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Teaching for Creativity in the Common Core Classroom (2015, background): “Making creativity a habit of thought (Sternberg, 2006) is what accomplished creators do all the time.”
The Effects of Foreign Language Learning on Creativity (2012, background): “Sternberg (2006) pointed out that creativity is a decision that can be made by anyone but most people do not make because they are afraid of its costs.”
The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Idea Generation and Idea Evaluation (2011, methodology): “After the data collection phase of the study, three judges who were experts in creative problem solving evaluated the solutions generated by participants using the consensual assessment technique (Hennessey & Amabile, 1988; Reiter-Palmon, Mumford, OConnor Boes, & Runco, 1997).”
Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias (2010, background): “Fluency is based on the total number of ideas; originality is based on the number statistically infrequent or rare ideas; and flexibility refers to the number of themes or categories within the ideational pool (Runco, 1999; Runco & Albert, 1985; Torrance, 1988).”
Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. (2011, result): “But some people's top-two judgments covaried more strongly than others’ judgments did, consistent with the notion that creative evaluation is a skill that varies between people (Grohman et al., 2006 and Sternberg, 2006).”