Multiplex Targeted Sequencing Identifies Recurrently Mutated Genes in Autism Spectrum Disorders

By Brian J. O'Roak, Laura Vives, Wenqing Fu, Jarrett D. Egertson, I. Stanaway, I. G. Phelps, G. Carvill, Akash Kumar, Choli Lee, K. Ankenman and 16 more. Science, 2012

1,254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Autism Genes, Again and Again Despite recent advances in sequencing technologies and their lowered costs—effective, highly sensitive, and specific sequencing of multiple genes of interest from large cohorts remains expensive. O'Roak et al. (p. 1619; published online 15 November) modified molecular inversion probe methods for target-specific capture and sequencing to resequence candidate genes in thousands of patients. The technique was applied to 44 candidate genes to identify de novo mutations in a large cohort of individuals with and without autism spectrum disorder. The analysis revealed several de novo mutations in genes that together contribute to 1% of sporadic autism spectrum disorders, supporting the notion that multiple genes underlie autism-spectrum disorders. Large-scale human autism candidate gene resequencing implicates de novo mutations in six genes in ~1% of sporadic cases. Exome sequencing studies of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) have identified many de novo mutations but few recurrently disrupted genes. We therefore developed a modified molecular inversion probe method enabling ultra-low-cost candidate gene resequencing in very large cohorts. To demonstrate the power of this approach, we captured and sequenced 44 candidate genes in 2446 ASD probands. We discovered 27 de novo events in 16 genes, 59% of which are predicted to truncate proteins or disrupt splicing. We estimate that recurrent disruptive mutations in six genes—CHD8, DYRK1A, GRIN2B, TBR1, PTEN, and TBL1XR1—may contribute to 1% of sporadic ASDs. Our data support associations between specific genes and reciprocal subphenotypes (CHD8-macrocephaly and DYRK1A-microcephaly) and replicate the importance of a β-catenin–chromatin-remodeling network to ASD etiology.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b250fc7542307e0719e62c1b17e67d6bb32f71ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Daniel H. Geschwind
  2. M. Lynch

In Genetics

  1. Brian J. O'Roak
  2. Daniel H. Geschwind
  3. Evan E. Eichler
  4. Neelroop Parikshak
  5. Michael Jeffrey Gandal
  6. Jay Shendure
  7. Osnat Penn
  8. N. Katsanis

In Molecular Biology

  1. Brian J. O'Roak
  2. Michael Jeffrey Gandal
  3. Neelroop Parikshak
  4. Sara Evans-Dutson
  5. Evan E. Eichler
  6. Jay Shendure
  7. Daniel H. Geschwind
  8. Taylor L. Mighell

Citations in the corpus