Women at the Bargaining Table: Pitfalls and Prospects
By C. Tinsley, Sandra I. Cheldelin, A. Schneider, Emily T. Amanatullah. 2009
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b241a06a6958034c174d8037029f1e93717e6e95
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Muriel Niederle
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Rachel Rudinger
- Christine L. Exley
- Lise Vesterlund
- Owen Hargie
- Yang Trista Cao
In Sociology and Political Science
- Muriel Niederle
- Lise Vesterlund
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Rachel Rudinger
- Christine L. Exley
- Owen Hargie
- Yang Trista Cao
Citations in the corpus
- Analyzing Stereotypes in Generative Text Inference Tasks (2021, background): “Overall, stereotypes can harmful even when positive; the nurturing stereotype of women is used to justify exclusion from professional settings (Tinsley et al., 2009), and, for women who do not conform to the stereotype, can lead to increased sexual harassment (Leskinen et al., 2015).”
- The Handbook of Communication Skills (2018, background): “Tinsley et al. (2009) provide a detailed set of “bilingual” behavioural prescriptions for “women at the bargaining table” that suggest accepting and using the core feminine stereotype to meet expectations while simultaneously working to reduce its activation and challenge the legitimacy of…”
- Knowing When to Ask: The Cost of Leaning In (2020, background): “They may give rise to future costs in the form of backlash (Bowles, Babcock, and Lai 2007; Tinsley et al. 2009; Amanatullah and Morris 2010; Amanatullah and Tinsley 2013), damage to one’s reputation, or decreased chances of future negotiations being successful.5 Further negotiation costs may be…”