An Empirical Evaluation of The Effects of R&D Subsidies

By Isabel Busom *. 2000

629 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b227d3607205449cf19e5b94193b92a534fe9e50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. (2013, background): “This is important given that in our subsequent analysis of the effect of FP funding we need to make sure that potential effects of the FPs are indeed due to treatment (i.e. funding) and not just to the selection of better performing regions (see for instance Busom 2000).”
R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience (2008, background): “Some studies (such as Klette and Moen, 1998; Busom, 2000; Wallsten, 2000; Hussinger, 2006) took into account the possibility of such”
Do Cooperative Research and Development (R&D) Subsidies Stimulate Regional Innovation Efficiency? Evidence from Germany (2015, background): “For instance, BUSOM (2000) investigates whether the participation in R&D subsidy 1088 Tom Broekel programmes impacts firms’ R&D efforts.”
R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semi-Parametric Two-Step Selection Models (2008, neutral): “Busom (2000) uses parametric selection models.”
The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis (2015, background): “4 Exceptions are Busom (2000), who finds a partial crowding out effect for Spain, nd Wallsten (2000), who reports a substitutive effect of subsidies for the U.S. SBIR rogram.”
Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis (2010, positive): “Most studies conclude that government R&D support leads to additional private R&D, innovation expenditures or innovation outputs and not to crowding out of private R&D by public R&D support (Aerts and Schmidt, 2008; Almus and Czarnitzki, 2003; Bérubé and Mohnen, 2009; Busom, 2000; Czarnitzki and Lic”
Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? (2009, background): “…funding difficulties and industry, are correlated with public funding and R&D spending (Aerts & Czarnitzki, 2004; Almus & Czarnitzki, 2003; Busom, 2000; Blanes & Busom, 2004; Czarnitzki, 2001; Czarnitzki & Hussinger, 2004;Czarnitzki & Fier, 2002; Duguet, 2004; Heijs & Herrera, 2004;…”
The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations (2012, methodology): “Our approach can be seen as combining the CDM model with the control-function methodology of Busom (2000), although there are some notable differences. First, access to panel data enables us to condition on lagged innovation and patenting variables, both in the equation determining participation in ”
The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises (2015, background): “Following Busom et al. (2014), these differences can be summarized in three groups: timing of support, eligibility/ requirements for support, and magnitude of support (Table 2).”
The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships (2008, background): “Estimates of input additionality are obtained in Wallsten (2000), Busom (2000), Lach (2002), Almus and Czarnitzki (2003).”
Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix (2015, background): “Similarly, Busom (2000) suggests the possible endogeneity of R&D subsidies and tries to deal with the issue of selection bias with a structural approach whereby she first estimates the probability of a firm taking part in a public R&D subsidies programme and only thereafter does she estimate the…”
Who participates in R&D subsidy programs?: The case of Spanish manufacturing firms (2004, neutral): “30 The extent of additionality effects of R&D subsidies in Spain has been addressed by Busom (2000) and González et al.”