Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind.

By G. Awad. 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

MECHANISMS OF MORAL DISENGAGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MILITARY FORCE: THE IMPACT OF SEPT. 11 (2006, background): “…between moral disengagement practices and inhumanities perpetrated under conditions of social strife and tyranny lend further support to the contributory role of moral disengagement (Andrus, 1969; Bandura, 1990, 2004; Ivie, 1980; Kelman & Hamilton, 1989; Rapoport & Alexander, 1982; Reich, 1990).”
Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. (2001, background): “The moral disengagement is shown in the perpetration of large-scale inhumanities (Andrus, 1969; Bandura, 1990; Kelman & Hamilton, 1989; Rapoport & Alexander, 1982; Reich, 1990) and social punitiveness in laboratory conditions conducive to disengagement of moral selfsanctions (Bandura, Underwood, et ”
Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency (2002, background): “People will behave in ways they normally repudiate if a legitimate authority accepts responsibility for the effects of their conduct (Milgram, 1974; Diener, 1977).”
WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR (2012, background): “Illustrations include the justifying of military atrocities as serving a worthy goal (Kramer, 1990; Rapoport & Alexander, 1982) or the recasting of inappropriate behavior such as unfair treatment as appropriate to protect friends or an organization.”