Reference dependence in cumulative prospect theory

By Ulrich Schmidt. 2003

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1b792ed81be46853c4c0f248fde76fe45516bb5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Han Bleichrodt
2. Peter P. Wakker
3. Veronika Köbberling

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Han Bleichrodt
2. Peter P. Wakker
3. Veronika Köbberling
4. Mohammed Abdellaoui

In General Decision Sciences

1. Han Bleichrodt
2. Peter P. Wakker
3. Veronika Köbberling
4. Mohammed Abdellaoui
5. Gijs van de Kuilen
6. Adam S. Booij
7. Glenn W. Harrison
8. E Elisabet Rutström

Citations in the corpus

• An index of loss aversion (2005, background): “Schmidt [50] and Sugden[56] gave general preference axiomatizations for models with varying reference points.”
• Reference-dependent utility with shifting reference points and incomplete preferences (2007, background): “Schmidt (2003) also imposed the common assumptions of decision theory, in particular completeness of reference-dependent preferences.”