What we should know about regional systems of innovation

By David Doloreux. 2002

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1a1eeacb9b8bd199d4b0d145f12ec8e1ae4789f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues (2005, background): “According to Staber [46] and Doloreux [28], without such comparison, it is difficult to fully understand and capture the degree to which a regional innovation system approach is applied and its subsequent potential impact on regional and industrial development in different regions.”
A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research (2017, background): “The literature on regional innovation systems (RISs) has grown impressively in the last two decades (Asheim & Gertler, 2005; Asheim, Grillitsch, & Trippl, 2017; Cooke, Heidenreich, & Braczyk, 2004; Doloreux, 2002; Isaksen & Trippl, 2016; Tödtling & Trippl, 2005).”
Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? (2017, background): “as a comprehensive umbrella framework that synthesizes notions, ideas, insights and lessons from a range of studies and literatures that deal with innovation in a regional context (Doloreux 2002), including a.”
Regional networks of small and medium sized enterprises: evidence from the Metropolitan Area of Ottawa in Canada (2004, result): “…of product innovators in Ottawa is a rather high figure taking into account that the population surveyed included only small firms, compared to, for example, studies on metropolitan areas like Milan—66.0% (Capello, 2001), Stuttgart—65.6% (Strambach, 2001) and Stockholm—63.0% (Doloreux, 2002c).”
Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions (2008, background): “The innovative milieux approach (Aydalot and Keeble, 1988; Camagni, 1991; Maillat, 1998), Innovation system concepts in different variants: national (NIS: Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993; Edquist, 1997, 2005), sectoral and technological (SIS: Breschi and Malerba, 1997; Malerba, 2005), and regional inno”
Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada (2008, background): “The innovation support infrastructure is a central component of the innovation system and is itself made up of three elements (Doloreux 2002, Coenen 2006): (1) organizations that promote the diffusion of technology (science and technology parks) or develop new industrial activities (incubators);…”
Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions (2018, background): “Such a broad interpretation of ‘entrepreneurial discovery’ resonates well with systemic approaches to innovation and regional development (Asheim & Gertler, 2005; Asheim & Isaksen, 2002; Cooke, 1992; Doloreux, 2002; Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2000; Morgan, 1997; Morgan & Cooke, 1998; Tödtling & Trippl”
Constructing Regional Advantage: Towards State-of-the-Art Regional Innovation System Policies in Europe? (2011, background): “A RIS is made up of the subsystems of knowledge generation and knowledge exploitation, as well as of policy organizations and actors situated in a regional socio-economic territory (Autio, 1998; Cooke et al., 2004; Doloreux, 2002; Tödtling & Trippl, 2005).”
Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions ★ (2014, unknown): “…(Lundvall, 1992, 2012; Nelson, 1993; Freeman, 1997), ‘regional system of innovation’ (Cooke and Morgan, 1993, 1998; Cooke et al., 1997; Enright, 2003; Doloreux, 2002; Asheim and Gertler, 2005), and ‘learning region’ (Morgan, 1997), which emphasise the importance of the territorial dimension, the…”
Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links (2006, background): “The concept of regional innovation systems (Autio, 1998; Braczyk et al., 1998; Cooke et al., 2000; Doloreux, 2002) has led to a better understanding of the role played by the institutional infrastructure in supporting local learning 1040 F.”
One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach (2005, methodology): “In this context also several typologies of RIS have been developed (for an overview see Thomi and Werner 2001, Doloreux 2002).”