Interacting effects of landscape context and habitat quality on flower visiting insects in agricultural landscapes

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees (2008, unknown): “proportion of semi-natural habitats (Kleijn and van Langevelde, 2006).”
Pollinator dispersal in an agricultural matrix: opposing responses of wild bees and hoverflies to landscape structure and distance from main habitat (2009, background): “Thus, females can disperse into landscapes in a linear manner, alternating between feeding and ovipositioning, whereas bees need to return to their brood cells repeatedly after foraging ( Kleijn and van Langevelde 2006 ).”
At what spatial scale do high-quality habitats enhance the diversity of forbs and pollinators in intensively farmed landscapes? (2007, background): “In intensively farmed north-western European landscapes, the last remaining areas with high biodiversity are seminatural habitats such as woodlots, ponds, riparian fragments, unimproved grasslands, heathlands or nature reserves ( Kleijn & van Langevelde 2006 ).”
Opportunities to enhance pollinator biodiversity in solar parks (2021, unknown): “148,179,180], other wild bees [148,179,181–184], butterflies [60,102, 151,174,183,185–191], hoverflies [51,64,65,70,74,184,188,192] and mixed pollinators [67,68,93,175,177].”