General strain theory, situational anger, and social networks: An assessment of conditioning influences

By George E. Capowich, P. Mazerolle, Alex R. Piquero. 2001

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b10f6f24faac9c6f303fe48510e9ad29005c71ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Epidemiology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Examining the Links between Strain, Situational and Dispositional Anger, and Crime (2003, background): “Given its prominent role in specifying GST, the role of anger has been investigated previously in a number of empirical examinations (Aseltine et al., 2000; Brezina, 1996; Broidy, 2001; Capowich et al., 2001; Mazerolle et al., 2000; Mazerolle & Piquero, 1997, 1998).”
Strain and violence: Testing a general strain theory model of community violence (2003, background): “Social support is often thought of in terms of ‘‘networks of interpersonal relationships’’ (Capowich et al., 2001) and social capital refers to the assets available to individuals based on their inclusion in social networks (Bourdieu, 1985; Portes, 1998).”
Specifying General Strain Theory: An Ethnically Relevant Approach (2008, background): “…interpersonal level attributes, such as moral beliefs, self efficacy, social support networks, and exposure to deviant peers (Aseltine et al. 2000; Capowich et al. 2001; Mazerolle and Piquero 1997; Paternoster and Mazerolle 1994); however, GST also recognizes that the larger social environment…”
Experienced and vicarious victimization: Do social support and self-esteem prevent delinquent responses? (2010, methodology): “Given the challenges encountered by much GST research using multiplicative interaction terms to test conditional effects (Mazerolle & Maahs, 2000), the analyses followed the approach used by Capowich et al. (2001), dividing the sample into groups.”
Street Youth, Gender, Financial Strain, and Crime: Exploring Broidy and Agnew's Extension to General Strain Theory (2007, background): “2See Agnew et al. 2002; Aseltine et al. 2000; Baron 2004; Baron and Hartnagel 2002; Capowich et al. 2001; Hoffman and Miller 1998; Jang and Johnson 2003; 2005; Mazerolle and Maahs 2000; Mazerolle et al. 2000; Paternoster and Mazerolle 1994; Robbers, 2004.”
Can general strain theory explain white-collar crime? A preliminary investigation of the relationship between strain and select white-collar offenses (2004, background): “Additionally, it has been noted that objective strains (most easily measured in GST tests) and subjective strains (specific events or conditions that are unpleasant to a specific individual) are two distinct entities (Agnew, 2001a; Capowich et al., 2001), and that an individual level theory such as ”
Gender Differences in Strain, Negative Emotions, and Coping Behaviors: A General Strain Theory Approach (2007, background): “This is the so-called “situational” emotion, which Agnew’s (1992) GST focuses on, as opposed to the “trait” or “dispositional” emotion (Baron, 2004; Capowich et al., 2001; Mazerolle & Piquero, 1998; Mazerolle, Piquero, & Capowich, 2003).”
Family Strain, Gender, and Delinquency (2003, background): “Other studies have reached similar conclusions (Agnew 1985, 1993; Aseltine, Gore, and Gordon 2000; Brezina 1998; Capowich, Mazerolle, and Piquero 2001; Mazerolle and Piquero 1997, 1998; Piquero and Sealock 2000).”
The Role of Negative Emotion in General Strain Theory (2008, background): “Except Baron (2004), other findings regarding the role of anger in relation to other forms of crime (e.g., drug use, property crime) are less robust (Capowich et al., 2001; Mazerolle et al., 2000; Mazerolle & Piquero, 1998; Piquero & Sealock, 2000).”