Can general strain theory explain white-collar crime? A preliminary investigation of the relationship between strain and select white-collar offenses

By L. Langton, Nicole Leeper Piquero. 2004

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfc74bafd3675efa2cc1a962c68f67fcf3e95ead

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Agnew
2. F. Cullen
3. Nicole Leeper Piquero
4. Travis C. Pratt
5. Alex R. Piquero
6. Kevin M. Beaver
7. Cortney A. Franklin
8. M. Delisi

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nicole Leeper Piquero
2. F. Cullen
3. R. Agnew
4. Alex R. Piquero
5. Stephen W. Baron
6. Byongook Moon
7. Travis C. Pratt
8. James D. Unnever

Citations in the corpus

• General Strain Theory and White-Collar Crime (2009, background): “themselves or their families was the most common motive for offending among a sample of convicted white-collar criminals (also see Braithwaite 1992; Coleman and Ramos 1998:10–11; Cressey 1953; Langton and Piquero 2007; Schoepfer and Piquero 2006; Weisburd and Waring 2001).”
• The Psychological Profile of White-collar Offenders (2012, unknown): “A recent review (Ragatz & Fremouw, 2010) of the WC research demonstrated scholars (Benson & Moore, 1992; Daly, 1989; Langton & Piquero, 2007; Poortinga, Lemmen, & Jibson, 2006; Walters & Geyer, 2004; Weisburd, Chayet, & Waring, 1990; Wheeler, Weisburd, Waring, & Bode, 1988) have predominately…”