Sexual-Minority and Heterosexual Youths' Peer Relationships: Experiences, Expectations, and Implications for Well-Being
By L. Diamond, Sarah Lucas. 2004
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Reproductive Medicine, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0ecc027ad331c66240eb1a6cf95a967fe65761d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reproductive Medicine
In Social Psychology
- W. Furman
- B. Bradford Brown
- W. A. Collins
- James D. Larson
- Bradley J. Bond
- S. McClelland
- Charlene K. Baker
- Jeremy P. Bakken
Citations in the corpus
- Adolescent romantic relationships and experiences (2009, background): “…are fewer potential partners or fewer who are openly identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual (Diamond, et al., 1999), but the number of romantic relationships is comparable to the number for heterosexual youth for those who are involved in organizations for sexual minorities (Diamond & Lucas, 2004).”
- Who is the “Self” in Self Reports of Sexual Satisfaction? Research and Policy Implications (2011, background): “, those individuals for whom laws, violence, coercion, norms, or biases regulate aspects of their sexual behaviors, relationships, sexual health, and gender presentation; see International Planned Parenthood Federation 2008; Richardson 2000) has become an increasingly pressing question for researche”
- “What do you mean when you say that you are sexually satisfied?” A mixed methods study (2014, background): “Studies with LGBTQ samples have indicated that sexual socialization, sexual stigma, and homophobia may play a role in sexual satisfaction in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer individuals (Bliss and Horne, 2005; Diamond and Lucas, 2004; Henderson et al., 2009; Holmberg, Blair, & Phillips, 2010).”
- Parasocial Relationships with Media Personae: Why They Matter and How They Differ Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adolescents (2018, background): “However, young LGB adolescents’ social networks are less developed than heterosexual adolescents’ social networks, potentially because of the absence of openly LGB peers or fears of ostracism from close heterosexual peers (Diamond & Lucas, 2004).”
- Intimate Justice: A Critical Analysis of Sexual Satisfaction (2010, background): “Diamond and Lucas (2004), for example, found that sexual minority youth developed low expectations for satisfying and fulfilling romantic relationships.”
- Peer relationships in adolescence. (2009, background): “Diamond and Lucas ( 2004 ), for example, provided a provocative comparison of friendships among sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents.”