Measuring Resilience

By Robert R. Hoffman, Peter A. Hancock. 2017

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Lindsey Jones
2. Robert R. Hoffman
3. Jordan Litman
4. Paul J Silvia
5. Emily M. Grossnickle
6. Patrick Mussel
7. G. Lunsford

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. Lindsey Jones
2. Robert R. Hoffman

In Social Psychology

1. Robert R. Hoffman
2. Shane T. Mueller
3. Lindsey Jones
4. Gary Klein
5. Jordan Litman
6. Emily M. Grossnickle
7. Patrick Mussel
8. Altay Eren

Citations in the corpus

• Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospects (2018, background): “With regard to performance at the work system level, considerations other than raw efficiency come into play (Hoffman & Hancock, 2017; Koopman & Hoffman, 2003).”
• Resilience isn't the same for all: Comparing subjective and objective approaches to resilience measurement (2018, background): “…toolkits extracted from a range of recent reviews that include both objective and subjective measures, namely Bours, McGinn, and Pringle (2014), Sturgess (2016), Constas, Cisse, Knippenberg, and Downie (2016), Jones and Tanner (2017), Maxwell et al. (2015), Claire et al. (2017), and Schipper…”