Spontaneous giving and calculated greed

By David G. Rand, Joshua D. Greene, Martin A. Nowak. Nature, 2012

1,386 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b09712f0c3e7bd5c04b5457fcdfc27fd94fbbf75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research (2021, neutral): “Comprehension refers to the degree to which participants seem to understand a task ’ s instructions (Berinsky et al., 2014; Rand et al., 2012).”
Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments (2017, background): “For example, Rand et al. (2012) found that giving participants comprehension questions before experimental materials caused them to alter their behavior inways that were highly relevant towhat was being tested.”
Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012) (2017, methodology): “For example, if no participants adhered to the instructions, an intent-to-treat analysis would show no effect (the participants Registered Replication Report: Rand et al., 2012 529 in the two conditions essentially did the same thing because none of them followed instructions).”
Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation (2016, background): “In line with this prediction, little consistent association has been found between an individual’s cognitive style and their overall willingness to cooperate in one-shot games (4, 43, 44).”
Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses (2014, background): “Games Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012) study how intuitive versus reflective reasoning influences decision making in public goods games using a number of experimental conditions.”
A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior (2020, background): “…and Barone 2011; Duclos and Barasch 2014; Allen, Eilert, and Peloza 2018; Simpson et al. 2018), moral identity (Aquino and Reed 2002; Reed and Aquino 2003; Aquino et al. 2007, 2011; Winterich et al. 2013; Reed et al. 2016), collective self-esteem (Shang et al. 2008), religiosity (Stavrova…”
Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction time reverse inference (2015, neutral): “These observations are again supported by a mixed-effects regression analogous to the one computed for the Dictator Game, which shows a significant effect of value difference (t(5,576)1⁄4 9.”
Priming in Economics (2016, methodology): “2 Priming in incentivized experiments has also been used to render other concepts salient, such as money [10,15,16], markets and competition [17–19], intuitive reasoning [18,20,21], morality [14,22], and observability [23– 27].”
The Effect of Cognitive Load on Economic Decision Making (2015, result): “This is in line with Rand et al. (2012) who find that across ten experimental designs, subjects who reach their decisions more quickly are more cooperative.”
Speed, Accuracy, and the Optimal Timing of Choices (2018, methodology): “We nonetheless retain α and δ here as we will use them in the next section to distinguish between utility and signal strength.”