Implementing guidelines on reporting research using animals (ARRIVE etc.): new requirements for publication in BJP

By John C. McGrath, Elliot Lilley. British Journal of Pharmacology, 2015

1,310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Small Animals, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b08e53fe55a20b7a4d645e21149b474a7411fff2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Innes C. Cuthill

In Small Animals

1. John C. McGrath
2. Elliot Lilley
3. Innes C. Cuthill

In Statistics and Probability

1. John C. McGrath
2. Elliot Lilley
3. Michael Emerson
4. M. Macleod
5. D. Howells
6. William J. Browne
7. Stanley E. Lazic
8. E. Sena

Citations in the corpus

• The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research* (2020, background): “Studies measuring the impact of ARRIVE on the quality of reporting have produced mixed results [6–11], and there is evidence that in vivo scientists are not sufficiently aware of the importance of reporting the information covered in the guidelines and fail to appreciate the relevance to their work ”
• Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers (2018, background): “Guidance on ethical animal experimentation is published elsewhere (McGrath and Lilley 2015) and will be updated separately in 2018.”
• Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019 (2019, background): “Studies measuring the impact of ARRIVE on the quality of reporting have produced mixed results [6-11] and there is evidence that in vivo scientists are not sufficiently aware of the importance of reporting the information covered in the guidelines, and fail to appreciate the relevance to their work ”
• Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020, background): “Studies measuring the impact of ARRIVE on the quality of reporting have produced mixed results [6–11], and there is evidence that in vivo scientists are not sufficiently aware of the importance of reporting the information covered in the guidelines and fail to appreciate the relevance to their work ”
• Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJP (2015, methodology): “In addition, when submitting the manuscript, authors will be required to box-tick a ‘declaration’ based on this, which is shown in and Lilley, 2015).”
• ARRIVE 2.0 and the British Journal of Pharmacology: Updated guidance for 2020 (2020, background): “In 2015, the BJP published an editorial reporting findings from a survey of compliance with ARRIVE in articles published in 2014 in two issues of the journal (McGrath & Lilley, 2015).”