Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019
By N. Percie du Sert, A. Ahluwalia, S. Alam, Marc T. Avey, Monya Baker, William J. Browne, Alejandra Clark, Innes C. Cuthill, U. Dirnagl, Michael Emerson and 17 more. bioRxiv, 2019
761 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting are vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings, and repeat or build upon the work of other researchers. The NC3Rs developed the ARRIVE guidelines in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to report in publications describing in vivo experiments. Despite widespread endorsement by the scientific community, the impact of the ARRIVE guidelines on the transparency of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. We have revised the ARRIVE guidelines to update them and facilitate their use in practice. The revised guidelines are published alongside this paper. This Explanation and Elaboration document was developed as part of the revision. It provides further information about each of the 21 items in ARRIVE 2019, including the rationale and supporting evidence for their inclusion in the guidelines, elaboration of details to report, and examples of good reporting from the published literature.
Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Small Animals, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c356732cb7935f9d8437c75a81d9038207ce7f43
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Small Animals
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies (2020, methodology): “Consequently, alternative sample size estimation methodologies were suggested for each study type (41-44).”