Hierarchical models in cognition: Do they have psychological reality?
By G. Cohen. 2000
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0837986b6dc5ba358f6234986d801924d7d94c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Gordon Winocur
- Morris Moscovitch
- Barbara Tversky
- Jeffrey M. Zacks
- Eva Svoboda
- Brian Levine
- Fergus I. M. Craik
- M. Milyavskaya
In Social Psychology
- M. Milyavskaya
- Barbara Tversky
- Frederick L. Philippe
- Jeffrey M. Zacks
- Brian Levine
- Morris Moscovitch
- Fergus I. M. Craik
- Gordon Winocur
Citations in the corpus
- Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? (2002, methodology): “In her excellent review of hierarchical models in cognition, Cohen (2000) distinguishes truly hierarchical models in which one level controls processing operations in the level below, from forms in which ‘‘there is simply a transfer of information from one stage to another’’ (Cohen, 2000, p.2).”
- Psychological need satisfaction across levels of experience: Their organization and contribution to general well-being (2013, background): “Hierarchical models imply that mental representations are organized from the most basic and concrete units at the lower end of the hierarchy to the most abstract representations at the top of the hierarchy (Cohen, 2000).”
- Event structure in perception and conception. (2001, background): “(For a comprehensive discussion EVENT STRUCTURE 36 of the psychological reality of hierarchical representations, see Cohen, 2000.)”
- Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval. (2002, background): “On the other hand, lower level elements in hierarchical knowledge structures are more difficult to retrieve (Cohen, 2000).”