Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not

By J. Shanteau, David J. Weiss, Rick P. Thomas, J. Pounds. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity (2007, background): “An excellent review of this expert disagreement phenomenon in different domains can be found in [20,21].”
Helpful Reviewers in TripAdvisor, an Online Travel Community (2011, background): “, length and depth) in an area, the person may be an expert (Shanteau et al., 2002).”
A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol (2018, background): “…very poor guides to determining a priori someone’s ability to provide good judgements in elicitation settings (Burgman et al., 2011; Shanteau et al., 2002; Tetlock & Gardner, 2015) and may result in the unnecessary exclusion of knowledgeable individuals (French, 2011; Shanteau et al., 2002).”
Silage corn production in conventional and conservation tillage systems. Part I: Sustainability analysis using combination of GIS/AHP and multi-fuzzy modeling (2014, background): “Although 95% consensus as obtained in this study, subjectivity is implicit because each xpert interprets things in light of his or her personal values which ould cause some biases in models (Shanteau et al., 2002).”