The role of visual-auditory “compellingness” in the ventriloquism effect: Implications for transitivity among the spatial senses

By D. H. Warren, R. Welch, T. McCarthy. 1981

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Importantly, however, it may not be sufficient (e.g., Warren et al., 1981).”
Unifying multisensory signals across time and space (2004, background): “…1998; Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Choe et al. 1975; Hairston et al. 2003; Jack and Thurlow 1973; Lewald and Guski 2003; Lewald et al. 2001; Pick et al. 1969; Radeau and Bertelson 1987; Slutsky and Recanzone 2001; Thomas 1941; Thurlow and Jack 1973; Warren et al. 1981; Welch and Warren 1980).”
The role of intersensory redundancy in early perceptual, cognitive, and social development (2012, background): “The 'ventriloquism effect' (Alais and Burr 2004 ; Radeau and Bertelson 1977 ; Warren et al. 1981 ) illustrates the powerful role of synchronous amodal information in guiding perception.”
Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. (2008, background): “, studies that presented participants with conflicting bimodal information while asking them to report the percept from either one or the other modality (e.g., Bertelson & Radeau, 1981; Massaro, 1998; Warren et al., 1981), were taken as evidence by other researchers that attending to one sensory mod”
Towards a general law of numerical/object identity. Commentary. Author's reply (2001, unknown): “Subjects who are not made to attend to the fact that the auditory and visual signals may come from two different objects are more likely to show an effect (e.g. Warren, Welch, and McCarthy, 1981).”
Knowledge about a Common Source Can Promote Visual — Haptic Integration (2007, result): “2 Results and discussion The results are shown in figure 2a (right panel). A repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted with within-participants factor vision ( d̀irect vision' and `mirror') and betweenparticipants factor task (`seen shape' versus `felt shape'). Because there was no significant differenc”
Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception (2007, background): “Numerous experimental studies have analyzed this kind of auditory-visual cue integration and found situations in which the cues are combined and situations in which they are processed separately [2,3,7,8,10,15,25–27].”
A "unity assumption" does not promote intersensory integration. (2011, methodology): “the inspected shapes were close to the objective visual shape, Welch (1999) interpreted Miller’s results, as had Miller himself, to mean that”
Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “, [12,46]) through to the instructions given by the experimenter as to whether the auditory and visual stimuli should be considered as having a common distal origin or not (see [46,51]).”