Comparison of Life History Traits between First-Generation Hatchery and Wild Upper Yakima River Spring Chinook Salmon
By C. Knudsen, S. Schroder, C. Busack, Mark V. Johnston, T. Pearsons, W. J. Bosch, D. Fast. 2006
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b009858b251450cb0fc64850d6304a1f7554f456
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Sara E. Williams
- Eric J. Ward
- E. Hoffman
- K. Kostow
- L. Garamszegi
- H. Wagner
- Marie-Josée Fortin
- J. Bence
In Genetics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Minimizing genetic adaptation in captive breeding programs: A review (2009, background): “Even a Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) supplementation hatchery program that used only natural-origin broodstock in an attempt to minimize adaptation resulted in a decrease in body size and shifts in the timing of maturation (Knudsen et al., 2006).”
- Mating success of alternative male phenotypes and evidence for frequency-dependent selection in Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (2010, background): “However, other anthropogenic forces such as size-selective harvest (Hankin and Healey 1986; Hankin et al. 2009) and hatchery rearing methods that promote high juvenile growth rates and early male maturation (e.g., Knudsen et al. 2006) should be considered as well.”
- Factors influencing the relative fitness of hatchery and wild spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Wenatchee River, Washington, USA (2010, background): “Hatchery fish have a tendency to mature at earlier ages than wild fish (Knudsen et al. 2006; Murdoch et al. 2008), but the difference is subtle and does not explain the differences in age structure we observed.”
- Factors that contribute to the ecological risks of salmon and steelhead hatchery programs and some mitigating strategies (2009, background): “ Kostow et al. (2003) were able to demonstrate that the hatchery and wild steelhead in their study were reproductively segregated precluding genetic interactions; therefore the productivity declines demonstrated by Kostow and Zhou (2006) were due to ecological interactions.”