Minimizing genetic adaptation in captive breeding programs: A review
By Sara E. Williams, E. Hoffman. 2009
286 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ecaf54cd6459c5c73a615f5188c7a7ae8638c05b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- Genetic and demographic population management in zoos and aquariums: recent developments, future challenges and opportunities for scientific research (2011, background): “Nevertheless this is important, because individuals that are well adapted to the circumstances in captivity may be less well adapted to the circumstances in the wild and may show lower fitness upon reintroduction (Woodworth et al., 2002; Frankham, 2008; Williams & Hoffman, 2009).”
- Ex situ conservation genetics: a review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species (2011, background): “For a review on adaptation to captivity see Frankham (2008) or Williams and Hoffman (2009).”
- The amphibian microbiome: natural range of variation, pathogenic dysbiosis, and role in conservation (2017, background): “For other species, captive breeding remains controversial (Griffiths and Pavajeau 2008; Williams and Hoffman 2009; Harding et al. 2016).”