Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology

By M. Visser, Leonard J. M. Holleman. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2001

641 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afe032752f47932deea933b7ffabe0d130e3d067

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Visser
2. Francisco Pulido
3. Oscar Gordo
4. C. Both
5. C. Parmesan
6. Alastair J. Wilson
7. P. Gienapp
8. D. Nussey

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Visser
2. Francisco Pulido
3. C. Both
4. Alastair J. Wilson
5. C. Parmesan
6. P. Gienapp
7. R. Fox
8. D. Nussey

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Visser
2. C. Parmesan
3. C. Both
4. R. Fox
5. Francisco Pulido
6. C. Rahbek
7. Miguel B. Araújo
8. E. Post

Citations in the corpus

• Upper thermal tolerances of early life stages of freshwater mussels (2010, background): “Changing temperatures also can lead to asynchrony, a mismatch between life-history events and environmental conditions (Visser and Holleman 2001, Philippart et al. 2003).”
• Photoperiodic Response and the Adaptability of Avian Life Cycles to Environmental Change (2004, background): “…that rely on the annual change in daylength for timing their life cycles, like most birds, will become desynchronised with the temperature-dependent selective environment, if photoperiodic responses do not change correspondingly (Visser et al., 1998, 2004, this volume; Visser and Holleman, 2001).”
• Global Climate Change Leads to Mistimed Avian Reproduction (2004, background): “As reaction norms evolved for a limited range of environmental conditions, it is not the question whether animals can adapt either via phenotypic plasticity or via changes in gene frequencies, but much more via changes in the genetic basis of phenotypic plasticity (Visser and Holleman, 2001).”
• Keeping up with early springs: rapid range expansion in an avian herbivore incurs a mismatch between reproductive timing and food supply (2009, background): “Recent studies mainly emphasized the inability of species to adapt sufficiently to rapidly changing environments (Both & Visser, 2001; Visser & Holleman, 2001; Gienapp et al., 2008).”
• The Response of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Climate Variability Associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation (2013, background): “The synchrony of winter moth (Operophtera brumata) egg hatching and oak (Quercus robur) bud have been low in recent warm springs [Visser and Holleman, 2001].”
• Global warming and positive fitness response in mountain populations of common lizards Lacerta vivipara (2006, background): “In turn, this is likely to cause changes in community compositions and mismatches within the environment (Harrington et al., 1999; Visser & Holleman, 2001; Stenseth & Mysterud, 2002; Sanz et al., 2003).”
• Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. (2007, background): “First, changes in climatic conditions might act differentially on interacting species and could lead to phenological mismatches that would affect whole communities [ 13 ].”
• Grapevine insect pests and their natural enemies in the age of global warming (2016, background): “…conditions can also completely disrupt the synchronization in phenology between the different trophic levels as have been proved for egg hatching of the winter moth Operophtera brumata and bud burst of its primary host plant oak (Quercus robur) (van Asch and Visser 2007; Visser and Holleman 2001).”
• Ecological responses to recent climate change (2002, background): “Evidence also indicates that warmer spring weather in Europe has disrupted the synchrony between winter moth ( Operophtera brumata ) hatching and oak bud burst, leading to a mismatch between the peak in insect availability and the peak food demands of great tit ( Parus major ) nestling”
• Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming (2007, background): “Conversely, a Dutch study which derived estimates from phenological models indicated that moth hatching should have advanced faster than oak budburst, suggesting an increasing asynchrony through time (Visser & Holleman, 2001).”
• Multiple Dimensions of Climate Change and Their Implications for Biodiversity (2014, background): “Examples include the climate-induced spread of pathogens (81, 82) or invasive species (83), decline of prey species (84), and disruption of synchronization between different trophic levels (85).”