META-ANALYSIS OF SOURCES OF VARIATION IN FITNESS COSTS OF PLANT ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSES

By J. Koricheva. 2002

410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af8c4c0442a00ebf8afcc4c2dc27cfee29da9fd4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta‐analysis (2011, background): “The costs of defence have been extensively studied, and although they have occasionally been difficult to quantify, many examples of direct, indirect and ecological costs have been documented (Simms 1992; Koricheva 2002; Strauss et al. 2002).”
Can optimal defence theory be used to predict the distribution of plant chemical defences? (2010, positive): “Evidence for different costs for different chemicals has been found previously: Koricheva (2002) showed that the relationship between growth and chemical concentration was negative for phenolics and alkaloids but was positive for terpenes, suggesting smaller costs in the production of terpenes.”
Uses and misuses of meta‐analysis in plant ecology (2014, background): “For examples of ecological meta-analyses tackling this problem see Koricheva (2002) and Limpens et al. (2012) 11.”
Rapid Evolutionary Change and the Coexistence of Species (2011, background): “Costs of defensive traits have been found in several systems (Koricheva 2002); similarly, selection for increased tolerance to particular stresses, such as desiccation or toxic heavy metals, can trade off with competitive ability and thus affect the equality between competitors.”
Resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides: genetic variation, costs, and environmental dependency (2007, background): “Considerable experimental work has addressed how environmental conditions affect the costs of resistance (Bergelson and Purrington 1996; Koricheva 2002).”
Variable Impact of Diverse Insect Herbivores on Dimorphic Datura wrightii (2002, background): “Although the impression may be that costs of resistance have been rarely demonstrated, recent reviews of the topic showed that significant costs of resistance are commonly found (Bergelson and Purrington 1996, Purrington 2000, Koricheva 2002).”
Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence (2007, background): “resource-based tradeoffs between herbivore resistance and growth, or as ecological costs that involve a decrease in fitness during interactions with other species (Koricheva, 2002).”
Costs of constitutive and herbivore‐induced chemical defences in pine trees emerge only under low nutrient availability (2011, background): “The existence of costs associated with the expression of constitutive defences has been well documented in several herbaceous species in recent decades (reviewed by Koricheva 2002) and more recently also in woody plants (e.g. Donaldson, Kruger & Lindroth 2006; Osier & Lindroth 2006).”
Nature and ecological implications of pathogen-induced systemic resistance in conifers: A novel hypothesis (2006, background): “Coniferous trees have evolved both constitutive and inducible defense systems that deter or kill insects and inhibit or exclude pathogens physically and/or chemically [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25].”
Optimal defence theory and flower petal colour predict variation in the secondary chemistry of wild radish (2004, background): “In one scenario, well-defended plants have higher fitness in years with high herbivore damage, whereas less-defended plants have higher fitness in low-herbivory years, due to reduced costs, as recently reviewed in Bergelson & Purrington (1996), Koricheva (2002) and Strauss et al .”
Trade‐offs between direct and indirect defences of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) (2008, background): “However, co-expression of multiple defences might be costly for a plant (Mole 1994; Mauricio 1998), since investment in defensive traits is assumed to reduce the resource availability for growth and reproduction (Herms & Mattson 1992; Bergelson & Purington 1996; Koricheva 2002; Strauss et al .”