Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing

By Ina Bornkessel, Matthias Schlesewsky, Angela D. Friederici. 2003

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af8c457e8a1f099ccda4173359851c370690df8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension (2005, result): “Twice as many sentences were presented in the ambiguous conditions, as previous ERP studies on very similar materials suggested that argument hierarchizing is not sensitive to word order variations in unambiguously case marked sentences (Bornkessel et al., 2003).”
Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. (2012, background): “…and Schlesewsky (2008) argue that there is ample evidence that the language processor constructs an interpretation of verb-final constructions before the critical verb is reached (see Bornkessel et al., 2003, for instance), and claim that this is problematic for the CCA account.”
The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. (2006, background): “This thematic reanalysis is reflected in an early parietal positivity (Bornkessel et al., 2002a, 2003).”
Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking (2004, methodology): “Each trial began with the presentation of an asterisk (300ms plus 300ms ISI) and ended with a 1000ms pause, after which participants were required to complete a comprehension task.”
Neural correlates of processing case in adults and children. (2025, unknown): “Overall, our findings partly converge with studies on the processing of case marking in nominative-accusative languages (Bornkessel et al., 2003b ; Dr ¨ oge et al., 2016 ; Hagiwara et al., 2007) in that we also found a processing advantage for arguments with the default case in sentence-initial…”