COMPETITION BETWEEN TWO ESTUARINE SNAILS: IMPLICATIONS FOR INVASIONS OF EXOTIC SPECIES

By J. E. Byers. 2000

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af80dd54ea476d7dda8b78035aec9c343fc01db7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

East meets west: competitive interactions between green crab Carcinus maenas, and native and introduced shore crab Hemigrapsus spp. (2002, background): “…marine species can affect native species in myriad ways, including direct predation (Race 1982), as vectors for parasites, diseases, and fouling organisms (Kuris & Culver 1999), or as competitors for food (Byers 2000) or space (Hockey & van Erkom-Schurink 1992, Geller 1999, Jousson et al. 2000).”
Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport (2001, background): “This exotic can outcompete a similiar native snail, Cerithidea californica, due to more efficient conversion of resources into growth, lighter parasite loads, higher dispersal rates, and better tolerance of hypoxia (Byers, 2000a–c).”
Can more K‐selected species be better invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Réunion (2007, background): “Such situations are not restricted to tephritid flies however: studying inter-tidal snails, Byers (2000) suggested that competitive ability could be an important characteristic of biological invaders, as did Evans (2004) studying ladybirds, and Vila & Weiner (2004) reached the same conclusion based…”
Population biology of invasive species. (2001, background): “Many studies have documented invaders that show a superior ability to exploit local resources when compared with native residents (Melgoza et al. 1990, Petren & Case 1996, Kupferberg 1997, Holway 1999, Byers 2000) or when compared with noninvading introduced species (Thebaud et al. 1996).”
Negative effects of Corbicula fluminea over native freshwater mussels (2018, background): “…show how invasive species can outcompete native species in terms of space (Carlton et al., 1999; McIntosh et al., 1992) and food resources (Byers, 2000; Alcaraz et al., 2008), mainly when those are scarce and become insufficient to support all organisms (Wiens, 1977; Gurnell et al., 2005).”
Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology (2006, background): “The alien snail, Batillaria attramentaria, can out-compete the native snail, Cerithidea californica, because of its superior growth response at any given level of the mediating prey species (diatom species) (Byers, 2000a).”
Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data (2017, background): “In the relatively few, detailed examples of exploitative competition that have been published, the invader has a competitive advantage to exploit the most abundant resource, due to better conversion efficiency of resources and/or superior harvesting ability (Byers, 2000).”
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions (2002, methodology): “The impacts of the introduced snail Batillaria attramentaria on specific demographic parameters, including survival, growth and reproduction, of the native snail Cerithidea californica in central California [ 18 ,19] have been quantified using manipulative field experiments and demographic models.”
Indirect effects of parasites in invasions (2012, background): “, Byers, J.E. & Huspeni, T.C. (2005) Differential parasitism of native and introduced snails: replacement of a parasite fauna. Biological Invasions, 7, 885–894. Werner, E.E. & Peacor, S.D. (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology, 84, 1083–1100. White, T.A. & Perkins, S.E. (2”
Biodiversity loss in the genus Artemia in the Western Mediterranean Region (2007, background): “The understanding of invasive mechanisms compel to an exhaustive comprehension of the interactions triggered between the exotic and the native species, since their fate becomes always rather more complex (Wooton, 1994; Grosholz & Ruiz, 1996; Byers, 2000).”
BIODIVERSITY, INVASION RESISTANCE, AND MARINE ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: RECONCILING PATTERN AND PROCESS (2002, background): “In particular, despite a growing number of well-documented invasions in marine systems (Carlton 1996, Cohen and Carlton 1998), comparatively little is known about the mechanisms underlying the success or failure of invasions and their consequences for native communities (e.g., Byers 2000).”
Prolonged Lag in Population Outbreak of an Invasive Mussel: A Shifting-Habitat Model (2004, background): “(Carlton and Geller 1993; Byers 2000; Grosholz et al. 2000; Grosholz 2002).”
A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasions in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) (2004, background): “Studies have already shown that in the case of two species, the exotic invader species tends to be more competitive by a better conversion efficiency of resources (Byers, 2000) or a superior harvesting ability (Petren & Case, 1996).”
Release from Parasites as Natural Enemies: Increased Performance of a Globally Introduced Marine Crab (2004, background): “Enhanced performance of a species in a new area may be due to at least three ecological factors: (1) reduced competition (Settle and Wilson 1990; Byers 2000; Callaway and Aschehoug 2000); (2) better environmental conditions, such as increased food resources (Dobson 1988); and (3) an absence of natur”
A framework to study the context-dependent impacts of marine invasions (2011, background): “…and L. littorea (11.09, Lubchenco, 1983), whereas the lowest density effects were recorded for filter and deposit feeding tunicates, gastropods and polychaetes, including S. clava (0.19, Ross et al., 2007), Batillaria attramentaria (0.19, Byers, 2000) and S. spallanzanii (0.08, Ross et al., 2007).”