Prolonged Lag in Population Outbreak of an Invasive Mussel: A Shifting-Habitat Model

By Gil Rilov, Y. Benayahu, A. Gasith. Biological Invasions, 2004

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9facc26e332c1251d9dfe02fe7cc7365ab7d5e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Marine Bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea – History, Distribution and Ecology (2009, background): “pharaonis beds were found in the mid-1990s, about 120 years after initial introduction (Rilov et al. 2004).”
The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact (2007, background): “Furthermore, because lag times between the introduction of a species and its maximum impact can span years to decades (e.g. Potvin et al. 2003; Rilov et al. 2004), data provided by studies done in the early stages of an invasion might also underestimate impact, although we attempted to deal with…”
Sydney Harbour: a review of anthropogenic impacts on the biodiversity and ecosystem function of one of the world’s largest natural harbours (2015, background): “pharaonis was competitive inferior than the native mussel Mytilaster minimus – the dominant mussel before the habitat degradation (Rilov et al. 2004; Didham et al. 2007).”
Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions (2017, background): “…the proliferation of non-native mussels, Brachidontes pharaonis , on nearshore beach rock habitats N 120 years after ﬁ rst introduction is thought to have been precipitated by a combination of habitat degradation and proliferation of the mussel on offshore platforms (Rilov et al., 2004).”
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species (2013, background): “…growth can result in short time lags between species introduction and conspicuous impacts, but prolonged lags (up to 100 years or more; e.g., Rilov et al. 2004) may result from habitat shifts, evolutionary adaptation by the nonnative species, or increased vulnerability of native species as…”
Growth of newly established alien populations: comparison of North American gypsy moth colonies with invasion theory (2006, background): “One explanation is the alteration of the habitat by the invader to make it more favorable over a long time period (e.g., Rilov et al. 2004).”
Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. (2008, background): “One explanation is the alteration of the habitat by the invader to make it more favorable over a long time period (105).”
Mytilid mussels: global habitat engineers in coastal sediments (2009, unknown): “Particularly, mussels have been introduced across oceans many times with both, facilitating and inhibiting e V ects on species in recipient ecosystems (e.g. Branch and Ste V ani 2004; Crooks 1998; Crooks and Khim 1999; Rilov et al. 2004; Robinson et al. 2007).”
Seeing red: alien species along the Mediterranean coast of Israel. (2007, background): “In the late 1990s a survey conducted in some of the same sites have shown a rapid shift in dominance, with some dense populations of up to 300 specimens per 100 cm² on rocky platforms “where mussel beds were absent in the past” (Rilov et al. 2004: 347).”
Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. (2007, unknown): “tion-level outcome for native species by increasing the relative importance of stochastic colonisation by invasive propagules, even in undisturbed habitats [ 25 ,57].”