Masses and Radii of Low-Mass Stars: Theory Versus Observations

By I. Ribas. 2005

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Eclipsing binaries with M-type components are still rare objects. Strong observational biases have made that today only a few eclipsing binaries with component masses below 0.6 M⊙ and well-determined fundamental properties are known. However, even in these small numbers the detailed comparison of the observed masses and radii with theoretical predictions has revealed large disagreements. Current models seem to predict radii of stars in the 0.4--0.8 M⊙ range to be some 5--15% smaller than observed. Given the high accuracy of the empirical measurements (a few percent in both mass and radius), these differences are highly significant. I review all the observational evidence on the properties of M-type stars and discuss a possible scenario based on stellar activity to explain the observed discrepancies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Education, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af64a99a94b5a2656c01d44bb3d8345d3e18a335

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Charbonneau
  2. Timothy Morton
  3. J. Johnson
  4. J. Southworth
  5. A. Mann
  6. Jon Fortney
  7. E. Gaidos
  8. J. Winn

In Education

  1. Timothy Morton
  2. T. Mazeh
  3. A. Mann
  4. C. Knigge
  5. J. Johnson
  6. Mercedes López-Morales
  7. J. Irwin
  8. E. Newton

In Instrumentation

  1. D. Charbonneau
  2. Timothy Morton
  3. J. Southworth
  4. A. Mann
  5. J. Johnson
  6. E. Gaidos
  7. Sara Seager
  8. Andrew W. Howard

Citations in the corpus