Estimating the tempo and mode of gene family evolution from comparative genomic data.

By Matthew W. Hahn, Tijl De Bie, Jason E. Stajich, Chi-Thoi Nguyen, Nello Cristianini. Genome Research, 2005

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Comparison of whole genomes has revealed that changes in the size of gene families among organisms is quite common. However, there are as yet no models of gene family evolution that make it possible to estimate ancestral states or to infer upon which lineages gene families have contracted or expanded. In addition, large differences in family size have generally been attributed to the effects of natural selection, without a strong statistical basis for these conclusions. Here we use a model of stochastic birth and death for gene family evolution and show that it can be efficiently applied to multispecies genome comparisons. This model takes into account the lengths of branches on phylogenetic trees, as well as duplication and deletion rates, and hence provides expectations for divergence in gene family size among lineages. The model offers both the opportunity to identify large-scale patterns in genome evolution and the ability to make stronger inferences regarding the role of natural selection in gene family expansion or contraction. We apply our method to data from the genomes of five yeast species to show its applicability.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af3106d5f9488df7a0f465eb584f00ff7d0b8f13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. R. Rytz
  2. Richard Benton
  3. Henrik Kaessmann
  4. Edward L. Braun
  5. Matthew W. Hahn
  6. Mira V. Han
  7. Jose Lugo-Martinez
  8. Ludovic Antoine Alexandre Orlando

In Molecular Biology

  1. Aidan Budd
  2. Richard Benton
  3. Eske Willerslev
  4. Henrik Kaessmann
  5. Edward L. Braun
  6. Matthew W. Hahn
  7. Mira V. Han
  8. Jose Lugo-Martinez

In Plant Science

  1. Richard Benton
  2. Henrik Kaessmann
  3. Edward L. Braun
  4. Matthew W. Hahn
  5. R. Rytz
  6. M. Springer
  7. Yang Liu
  8. C. Rahbek

Citations in the corpus