Go To Statement Considered Harmful
By E. Dijkstra. Software Pioneers, 2022
464 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aefa66c3f788ed459d799519a375f50d03d51d75
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Equality saturation: a new approach to optimization (2009, background): “Execution indices identify the state of progress of an execution [14, 41].”
- Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer Programming (2004, background): “Fortran led to Algol-60 and structured programming [46, 45, 130], which led to Simula-67 and object-oriented programming [137, 152].”
- Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) (2008, background): “In 1968, Dijkstra wrote ‘Go To Statement Considered Harmful’, a critique of existing programming practices that eventually led the programming community to adopt structured programming [8].”
- A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming (2007, background): “As early as 1970, many writers had pointed out the disadvantages and limitations of available languages [78, 30].”
- The New C Standard (Excerpted material) An Economic and Cultural Commentary (2008, unknown): “The controversy over the use of the goto statement has not abated since Dijkstra’s, now legendary, letter to the editor was published in 1968.[ 6 ] Many”