Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.
By Mohamed Estai, S. Bunt. Annals of Anatomy, 2016
788 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aef6deee65b78228df5e96e4049baf9adfbf3bd5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. (2016, background): “The values of these modalities enhance our appreciation of anatomy where cadaver resources have limited accessibility (24).”
- Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Medicine: Analysis of the Scientific Literature (2020, neutral): “When learning anatomy, AR can create an illusion that allows the display of internal anatomical structures on the body of the user [40].”
- The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy (2017, positive): “Therefore, the best way for educators to teach anatomy may be through combining multiple resources (plastic models, dissections and learning software) to achieve optimal results, as students benefit the most when a range of different learning modalities are available (Estai and Bunt, 2016).”