Understanding Driving: Applying Cognitive Psychology to a Complex Everyday Task

By J. Groeger. 2000

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeecaca3f85cb4de83e65c303852a2745f462ce2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Citations in the corpus

A Two-Point Visual Control Model of Steering (2004, background): “To estimate curvature from any other distant point on the road surface requires an estimate of the absolute distance to the point; a quantity which previous research has consistently demonstrated cannot be judged accurately by drivers (e.g., Groeger, 2000; Teghtsoonian & Teghtsoonian, 1970 ).”
DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering (2023, background): “Human drivers usually decompose their decision-making process into distinct stages that follow a logical progression which encompasses the identification and localization of key objects, their possible future action and interaction, and ego planning based on all this information [22, 46].”
Driving Experience and Situation Awareness in Hazard Detection (2013, neutral): “This conclusion lends support to Groeger’s (2000) suggestion that hazard perception testing has poor face validity, but it does not explain why some studies have”
Risk behaviour and mental workload: Multimodal assessment techniques applied to motorbike riding simulation (2009, background): “Nevertheless, as suggested by Groeger (2000), see also Groeger and Clegg (2007), the amount of practice is important for the acquisition of driving skills, so that other differenceswill be observedwhen participants have longer training and feedback on their performance.”
Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: Effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study (2005, background): “…withdrawal of attention, the second class of safety-relevant distraction effects, is a result of cognitive workload, which can be caused by the usage of mobile phones and can result in deteriorated object and event detection (Groeger, 2000; Haigney & Westerman, 2001; Strayer & Johnston , 2001).”
Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture (2006, background): “Of course, driving requires cognition during even routine driving, most obviously for higher level decision making, more subtly for lower level vehicle control and situation awareness (see, e.g., Groeger, 2000).”