Queuing for preferred territories: delayed dispersal of Siberian jays

By Jan Ekman, S. Eggers, Michael Griesser, H. Tegelström. 2001

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aeea5fbb53bd4249355f2a3d0e219cd0f52739d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Jan Ekman
2. Michael Griesser
3. S. Eggers
4. Carl Smith
5. M. Reichard
6. O. Krüger
7. P. Jurajda
8. S. Lima

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Michael Griesser
2. Jan Ekman
3. S. Eggers
4. M. Reichard
5. Carl Smith
6. O. Krüger
7. P. Jurajda
8. S. Lima

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Michael Griesser
2. Jan Ekman
3. M. Reichard
4. Carl Smith
5. S. Eggers
6. O. Krüger
7. P. Jurajda

Citations in the corpus

• Predator-induced reductions in nest visitation rates are modified by forest cover and food availability (2008, background): “…of the sum over all years (1989–2004) of the difference between the actual reproductive success within a given territory (0, failure; 1, success) and the probability of nest success in the population in general (proportion of nests that were successful) for each year (see Ekman et al. 2001).”
• Nepotistic mobbing behaviour in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus (2005, background): “Such a preferential treatment of relatives only would be nepotistic and could encourage offspring to postpone their natal dispersal and thereby be a key to the formation of kin groups (Brown & Brown 1984; Brown 1987; Ekman et al. 2001a, 2004; Griesser 2003a, b).”
• Male-male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus) (2004, background): “Restricted access to breeding sites frequently reduces population reproductive rates (Oliveira et al. 1999; Ekman et al. 2001) and the effect is typically mediated by the limit on breeding site availability per se (e.g. Village 1983; Nilsson 1987; Butchart et al. 1999).”
• Nepotistic vigilance behavior in Siberian jay parents (2003, background): “The benefits reported here should promote delayed dispersal together with other benefits already reported (Ekman et al., 1994, 1999, 2000, 2001b).”
• Age at first breeding and fitness in goshawk Accipiter gentilis (2005, background): “Models of dispersal commonly assume that birds assess a rather limited number of territories and settle in the best one they encounter (Lande 1987; Noon & McKelvey 1996; Ekman et al. 2001; Carrete et al. 2002).”
• Fighting to stay: the role of sibling rivalry for delayed dispersal (2002, background): “…a constraint in lack of suitable habitat may explain why offspring forego personal reproduction (Zack 1990; Komdeur 1992; Komdeur et al. 1995; Ekman et al. 2001b), it is not sufficient to explain why an offspring remains in the natal territory rather than disperses in search of habitat…”
• Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) (2005, methodology): “Siberian jays prefer highproductivity territories located farther away from human settlements, where they escape exposure to high numbers of corvid nest predators associated with man (Eggers, 2002; Ekman et al., 2001).”