Nepotistic vigilance behavior in Siberian jay parents
By Michael Griesser. 2003
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2b29bdb41a4325b8c46d8e059ec3600c6bf6236
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Jan Ekman
- Michael Griesser
- G. Beauchamp
- S. Eggers
- A. Cockburn
- B. Hatchwell
- Janis Dickinson
- Andrew F. Russell
Citations in the corpus
- What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? (2008, background): “With 2 exceptions (Heinsohn 1987; Griesser 2003), studies dealt with temporary feeding aggregations with fluid group membership.”
- Nepotistic alarm calling in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus (2004, background): “Relatedness between group members has been assessed by locating nests and banding the offspring (N 1⁄4 29, including unbanded immigrants in territories with failed reproduction or successful breeding) or from the parental tolerance displayed while sharing food with independent offspring (N 1⁄4 7; Gr”
- Nepotistic mobbing behaviour in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus (2005, background): “Such a preferential treatment of relatives only would be nepotistic and could encourage offspring to postpone their natal dispersal and thereby be a key to the formation of kin groups (Brown & Brown 1984; Brown 1987; Ekman et al. 2001a, 2004; Griesser 2003a, b).”