Vehicle–Vehicle Channel Models for the 5-GHz Band

By Indranil Sen, David W. Matolak. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print), 2008

457 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of Vehicles as Obstacles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (2011, background): “Extensive measurement campaigns reported in [23] analyzed urban, suburban, and highway environments with two levels of traffic density (high and low).”
A survey on vehicle-to-vehicle propagation channels (2009, methodology): “Reference [8] fitted the measurement results to a Weibull distribution, whereas [23] fitted data to Weibull and Nakagami distributions.”
A Survey of 5G Channel Measurements and Models (2018, methodology): “However, the measurements in [31] performed in highways and cities indicated that fading amplitudes of V2V channels are better fitted with the Weibull distribution than the Nakagami distribution.”
Path Loss Modeling for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications (2011, unknown): “[ 6 ] R. Liu, P. Spasojevic, and E. Soljanin, “Incremental redundancy coop-”
A Survey of Channel Modeling for UAV Communications (2018, methodology): “However, empirical studies have not yet been initiated for development of statistical channel model based on Weibull distribution, as for vehicle–to–vehicle channel modeling [82].”