City CarShare: First-Year Travel Demand Impacts

By Robert Cervero. 2003

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aecfc566192a9cf408ba2866fbe6bfe2b95bd549

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Regina R. Clewlow
2. Susan A. Shaheen
3. Yoonmo Koo
4. Jiyeon Jung
5. Elliot W. Martin
6. J. Lidicker
7. Klaus Hubacek
8. Michael Ornetzeder

In Marketing

1. Regina R. Clewlow
2. Susan A. Shaheen
3. Elliot W. Martin
4. Michael Ornetzeder
5. Edgar G. Hertwich
6. Yoonmo Koo
7. Jiyeon Jung
8. Daniel A. Guttentag

In Transportation

1. Regina R. Clewlow
2. Edgar G. Hertwich
3. Susan A. Shaheen
4. Elliot W. Martin
5. Klaus Hubacek
6. Michael Ornetzeder
7. Yoonmo Koo
8. Jiyeon Jung

Citations in the corpus

• Analyzing the Effects of Car Sharing Services on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions (2018, background): “These include reduced emissions [18], fewer private vehicles [19], reduction in travel distance [20] and increased mobility [21].”
• Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America (2011, background): “The results are reported in the form of an observed impact, which strictly evaluates the changes in emissions that physically occur, and a full impact, which also considers emissions that would have happened but were avoided due to carsharing.”
• The impact of free-floating carsharing on car ownership: Early-stage findings from London (2017, unknown): “The most widelyused approach is to survey carsharing users (e.g. Baptista et al. 2014; Martin and Shaheen 2010, 2016; Katzev 1999, Bewick et al. 2013, 2015; Cervero 2003; Cervero and Tsai 2004; Cervero et al. 2007, Becker et al. 2015; Firnkorn 2011; Robert 2000).”
• Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area (2016, background): “Several early studies on carsharing were conducted by Cervero when City CarShare was launched in San Francisco in 2001, based on surveys of members (and non-members) three months, nine months, and two years into the program (Cervero 2003, Cervero & Tsai 2004, Cervero et al. 2007).”
• Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings (2010, background): “Early carsharing adopters were primarily carless and used carsharing as a means to augment their mobility (5).”
• Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore (2014, unknown): “, [7] and [8], affect demand.”
• The environmental effect of car-free housing: A case in Vienna (2008, background): “They are part of a larger movement promoting pedestrian zones, home zones (Barrell andWhitehouse, 2004), car-sharing (Cervero, 2003; Loose et al., 2006; Prettenthaler and Steininger, 1999), and shifting the urban transportation mix towards more sustainable modes of transport (Wright and Curtis,…”
• Interventions to promote walking: systematic review (2007, unknown): “A controlled repeat cross sectional study examined the effect of City CarShare, a car sharing initiative in San Francisco, USA, whereby on payment of a small fee, members had access to car hire at a flat rate. Aspiring members, who were less likely to own or use cars at baseline than city residents ”
• Empirical analysis of free-floating carsharing usage: The Munich and Berlin case (2015, background): “Studying the usage of station-based carsharing shows that the highest number of rentals occur on Fridays and Saturdays (Concas et al., 2013) and most trips are made for shopping, social-recreational purposes or personal business (Cervero, 2003; Cervero and Tsai, 2004; Cervero et al., 2007).”