The influence of clear-cut logging and residual leave material on small mammal populations in aspen-dominated boreal mixedwoods

By Richard A. Moses, S. Boutin. 2001

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aec0a707bee46ff954b732608937c8060231423f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. D. Fauteux
2. Pierre Drapeau
3. L. Imbeau
4. L. Venier
5. Jason T. Fisher
6. S. Hannon
7. J. Pearce
8. S. Boutin

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Macdonald
2. Pierre Drapeau
3. S. Hannon
4. J. Pearce
5. S. Boutin
6. C. Paszkowski
7. M. Mazerolle

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. L. Venier
2. Pierre Drapeau
3. D. Fauteux
4. L. Imbeau
5. S. Macdonald
6. S. Hannon
7. J. Pearce
8. S. Boutin

Citations in the corpus

• Small mammals as bioindicators of sustainable boreal forest management (2005, background): “, 1995) and clearcutting (Hooven and Black, 1976; Martell and Radvanyi, 1977; Ramirez and Hornocker, 1981; Martell, 1983b; Monthey and Soutiere, 1985; Probst and Rakstad, 1987; Parker, 1989; Sullivan et al., 1999; Moses and Boutin, 2001).”
• Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure (2004, unknown): “Bowman et al. (2000) reported a positive relationship between red-backed vole density and coarse woody debris, but in another experimental study, presence of coarse woody debris in clearcut stands did not increase abundance of small mammals (Moses and Boutin, 2001).”
• Small mammal responses to coarse woody debris distribution at different spatial scales in managed and unmanaged boreal forests (2012, background): “We did not observe a positive response of deer mice abundance to tree removal, a pattern reported in many studies (Carey and Johnson, 1995; Steventon et al., 1998; Moses and Boutin, 2001; Etcheverry et al., 2005).”
• Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta (2002, background): “We did not expect deer mice to decline with decreasing buffer width because they respond positively to clearcuts (Martell and Radvanyi 1977; Sullivan and Krebs 1981; Martell 1983; Kirkland 1990; Moses and Boutin 2001).”
• Variable-retention harvests in the Pacific Northwest: A review of short-term findings from the DEMO study (2009, unknown): “For some species of small mammals, retention levels as low as or lower than 15% may be sufficient to maintain populations (e.g., Sullivan and Sullivan, 2001; Moses and Boutin, 2001).”
• The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest (2005, background): “…(Tevis, 1956; Gashwiler, 1970; Sims & Buckner, 1973; Hooven & Black, 1976; Martell & Radvanyi, 1977; West et al ., 1980; Scrivner & Smith, 1984; Martell, 1985a,b; Steventon et al ., 1998; Sullivan et al ., 1999), aspen (Probst & Rakstad, 1987) and mixedwood clearcuts (Moses & Boutin, 2001).”