Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A meta-analysis of the effects of wildfire, clearcutting, and partial harvest on the abundance of North American small mammals (2009, background): “In addition, deermice prefer openmicrohabitats (Pearson et al., 2001; Fuller et al., 2004; Kaminski et al., 2007; Zwolak, 2008; but see Goodwin and Hungerford, 1979; Morris, 2005), which are created in greater abundance by clearcutting in coniferous forest than in deciduous forest, as discussed abov”
The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage (2009, background): “, 1997), and tree seeds and invertebrate prey for small mammals (Fuller et al., 2004).”
Small mammal responses to coarse woody debris distribution at different spatial scales in managed and unmanaged boreal forests (2012, background): “, 1999; Pearce and Venier, 2005) or neutrally (Sullivan and Sullivan, 2001; Fuller et al., 2004; Zwolak and Foresman, 2008) to different CWD volumes at the stand-scale.”