Learning Corresponded Rationales for Text Matching
By Mo Yu, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. Jaakkola. 2018
8 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Douwe Kiela
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Mohit Bansal
- Graham Neubig
- Ethan Perez
- Mo Yu
- Richard Socher
Citations in the corpus
- Finding Generalizable Evidence by Learning to Convince Q&A Models (2019, methodology): “Prior work uses similar methods to explain what a specific model has learned (Lei et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2019).”
- EDUCE: Explaining model Decisions through Unsupervised Concepts Extraction (2019, methodology): “Such methods are specific to text data select and rationales, i.e. parts of text, on which the model bases its prediction, see [15, 27] and very recently [5].”
- A Game Theoretic Approach to Class-wise Selective Rationalization (2019, methodology): “The first class of method is to explicitly introduce a generator that learns to select important subsets of inputs as explanations [12, 19, 21, 30, 31], which often comes with some information-theoretic properties.”
- Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Control (2019, background): “Therefore the selective rationalization approach is easier to be adapted to new applications, such as question answering (Yu et al., 2018), image classification (Chen et al.”