Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment
By N. Dingemanse, C. Both, P. Drent, J. Tinbergen. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2004
933 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae753c18320871ad5e94d0e0400007326bddcc9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- N. Dingemanse
- Denis Réale
- Alexander D. M. Wilson
- J. Godin
- J. Cockrem
- Andrew Sih
- P. Drent
- Simon C. Griffith
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- N. Dingemanse
- Alexander D. M. Wilson
- Denis Réale
- Andrew Sih
- J. Godin
- Daniel T. Blumstein
- Jens Krause
- Ton G. G. Groothuis
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution (2007, background): “Great tit Parus major survival and the beech-crop cycle.”
- Exploration strategies map along fast–slow metabolic and life‐history continua in muroid rodents (2009, positive): “…et al. 2002) measure of exploration that has been found to be correlated with important behavioural, ecological and life-history parameters in the wild (Dingemanse et al. 2004; We obtained estimates of AFR for all species from Duncan, Forsyth & Hone (2007) and Nowak (1999) (see Table 1).”
- An empiricist guide to animal personality variation in ecology and evolution (2014, background): “As such it relies heavily on mixed-effect statistical modeling approaches (Dingemanse and Dochtermann, 2013).”
- Personalities in great tits, Parus major : stability and consistency (2005, background): “79 03–3472/05/$30.00/0 2005 The Association for the S aspects of a coherent and heritable behavioural organization maintained by natural selection (Koolhaas et al. 1999; Drent et al. 2003; Dingemanse et al. 2004; Sih et al. 2004; Groothuis & Carere 2005).”
- Personality and foraging decisions in fallow deer, Dama dama (2011, background): “Different conditions such as variation in predation pressure (Réale & Festa-Bianchet 2003) or food availability in a fluctuating environment (Dingemanse et al. 2004) have been shown to maintain personality variation in mammals and birds, respectively.”
- Boldness and Reproductive Fitness Correlates in the Eastern Mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki (2010, background): “Boldness has also been posited to be associated with traits that are fitness-related (Dingemanse et al. 2004; Sinn et al. 2006), heritable (Dingemanse et al. 2002; Brown et al. 2007a) and subject to natural selection (Réale & Festa-Bianchet 2003).”
- Personality in Non‐human Animals (2008, methodology): “Evidence supporting this idea is provided by a Netherlands research group that has been conducting long-term studies of personality in a natural population of great tits ( Dingemanse, Both, Drent, & Tinbergen, 2004; Groothuis & Carere, 2005).”
- Pairs of zebra finches with similar ‘personalities’ make better parents (2011, background): “2005) and recruit more offspring than nonassortative pairs despite potentially suffering reduced life expectancies (Dingemanse et al. 2004).”
- Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) (2010, background): “…of syndrome variation, however, have focused on populationlevel questions, such as the presence or absence of syndromes (Bell 2005; Dingemanse et al. 2007), whereas fitness consequences are often studied in single-context behavioral types (Bremner-Harrison et al. 2004; Dingemanse et al. 2004).”
- Covariation between personalities and individual differences in coping with stress: Converging evidence and hypotheses (2010, background): “In great tits the direction of selection on exploratory tendency changed from year to year in relation to the crop of beech masts, an important winter food (Dingemanse et al., 2004).”
- Behavioural syndromes in farmed fish: implications for production and welfare (2005, background): “Studies on these systems tell us that the variation is often inherited and that spatial or temporal variation in selection regimes means that different behavioural phenotypes perform best in different conditions (van Oortmerssen & Busser, 1989; Dingemanse et al., 2004).”