Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching

By Thomas Goschke. 2000

462 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae670bfa092e9e4bbfb22ea48198102fb9f33de2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

Citations in the corpus

Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. (2004, methodology): “…with those from previous dual-task studies using the list and precued task sequence paradigms (Baddeley et al., 2001; Emerson & Miyake, 2003; Goschke, 2000; Saeki & Saito, in press): Although participants often recruit inner speech to support their task switching performance, they do so…”
Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. (2010, methodology): “Several studies have shown that both kinds of processes indeed play a role (apart from those already mentioned; see, e.g., Goschke, 2000).”
Acquisition, representation, and control of action (2009, background): “In adults, verbalization has been demonstrated to reduce the mental costs associated with switching from one task to another (Baddeley, Chincotta, & Adlam, 2001; Emerson & Miyake, 2003; Goschke, 2000; Kray, Eber, & Lindenberger, 2004).”
Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. (2001, background): “Instead, the rules for the prior task may have to be suppressed during an inhibitory operation that is functionally distinct from the one that enables the rules for the current task (cf. Allport et al., 1994; Goschke, 2000; Mayr & Keele, 2000).”
The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions (2012, unknown): “As Goschke (2000) suggested, the ability to actively maintain a single task goal may indeed be a force that makes it difficult for individuals to flexibly switch to a different goal.”
A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. (2007, background): “First, we attempted to replicate previous results (Goschke, 2000), to show increased switch cost as a function of prior trial incongruency.”
Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control (2007, result): “In support of this criticism, other work has suggested that incongruent trials that precede a task switch do indeed impair performance in the new task set (Brown, Reynolds, & Braver, 2007; Goschke, 2000).”
The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation (2003, background): “Consistent with this anecdotal evidence, two recent studies suggest the involvement of inner speech in task switching performance (Baddeley, Chincotta, & Adlam, 2001; Goschke, 2000).”
Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. (2003, result): “They found that as the RSI increased up to 600ms, the cost of task switching decreased, an effect that was also reported by several other authors (e.g., Allport et al., 1994; Fagot, 1994; Goschke, 2000; Meiran, 1996).”
Control and interference in task switching--a review. (2010, background): “Other variants of predictable switching include either short sequences of just two tasks that were specified in advance (e.g., Goschke, 2000; Sohn & Anderson, 2001) or situations in which participants perform longer, more complex task sequences in a predictable manner (e.g., Gotler, Meiran, &…”
A systematic review of the relationship between rigidity/flexibility and transdiagnostic cognitive and behavioral processes that maintain psychopathology (2018, background): “This meta-flexibility account is in accordance with the aforementioned conceptualization that there is a “trade off” between stable goal maintenance and flexible goal adaptation (e.g., Goschke, 2000).”
Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data (2007, background): “…to account for a large amount of task-switching data (including the finding that task switching takes longer following high-conflict trials; see Goschke, 2000; Gruber & Goschke, 2004), and it could very well explain why control engagement following error trials and control engagement following…”
The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. (2004, background): “Recent findings have suggested that the time it takes to switch sets reflects multiple processes (e.g., Goschke, 2000; Meiran, 2000; Rubinstein, Meyer, & Evans, 2001).”
How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. (2004, unknown): “This interpretation fits with previous task-switching studies showing that switch costs are increased when a previously task-relevant stimulus feature activates a response that is incompatible with the response required by the current task (Goschke, 2000).”
ARTICLE WITH PEER COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task (2003, background): “Indeed, within the literature on task switching in adults, there is broad consensus that switching tasks requires not only enabling/activating/retrieving the rules appropriate for the new task, but also inhibiting/deactivating/disengaging from the mindset relevant to the other task (Allport, Styles ”