Epidemiology of the human circadian clock.

By Till Roenneberg, Tim Kuehnle, M. Juda, T. Kantermann, K. Allebrandt, M. Gordijn, M. Merrow. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 2007

1,528 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Strengthening Procedural Memories by Reactivation in Sleep (2014, methodology): “All participants had a regular circadian rhythm and were not extreme morning or evening types, as assessed by the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (Roenneberg et al., 2007).”
The Genetics of Mammalian Circadian Order and Disorder: Implications for Physiology and Disease (2008, background): “Perhaps the most obvious circadian rhythm in humans is the daily pattern of sleep and wakefulnes”
An Actigraphic Validation Study of Seven Morningness- Eveningness Inventories (2012, methodology): “The Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (Roenneberg et al., 2007) is often used as well, although this instrument measures sleep midpoint rather than the ME dimension.”
Circadian Typology: A Comprehensive Review (2012, background): “Weekend sleep takes into account the fact that ET accumulate a sleep debt which is repaid on weekends (Roenneberg et al., 2007).”
Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review (2019, methodology): “Therefore, it is not surprising that MCTQ- and MEQ-chronotype show a good correspondence [19,52].”
Is the shift in chronotype associated with an alteration in well-being? (2015, methodology): “Mid-sleep time on free days (MSF) was also calculated via a formula correcting for sleep need (MSFsc; Roenneberg et al. 2007).”