Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study
By S. Hove. 2000
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae3c094046449c50a00c08e537bacc313cdff198
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. (2017, background): “…and Richards, 2007): (i) ‘substantive’ benefits, as stakeholders' perspectives, conditions and knowledge inform and improve planning (van den Hove, 2000); (ii) ‘instrumental’ benefits, as the process becomes better understood andmore acceptable to stakeholders, and hence better supported…”
- A Rationale for Science-Policy Interfaces (2007, background): “One potential way of creating such room is to ensure that science–policy interfaces are participatory, as participatory settings allow for the various and often irreconcilable values underlying problem definition and social choices to be explicitly introduced and accounted for in the scientific qual”