Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice
By Daniel Lathrop, Laurel Ruma. 2010
478 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae27f24a23ff90bacbb9738a25559f656595dffd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jakko Kemper
- Daan Kolkman
- Clare Birchall
- Maxat Kassen
- Heike Felzmann
Citations in the corpus
- A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project (2013, background): “…idea which advocates citizens' right to have a free access to information about their government at the federal and local level via the use of digital government platforms (Francoli, 2011; Harrison et al., 2011; Lathrop & Ruma, 2010; Meijer, Curtin, & Hillebrandt, 2012; Robinson et al., 2009).”
- Big Data for Development: A Review of Promises and Challenges (2016, unknown): “…and produced by the natural quasi-monopoly of the public sector is a natural place to push for the public provision of data, a discussion which often runs under the heading of “open governments” (Lathrop and Ruma, 2010; Kum, Ahalt and Carsey, 2011; Concha and Naser, 2012; WEF and Vital Wave, 2012).”
- Transparent to whom? No algorithmic accountability without a critical audience (2018, background): “Some suggest that publication of datasets and other open-access schemes can bring about gains in transparency, accountability, and fairness (Lathrop & Ruma, 2010).”
- Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective (2011, unknown): “In this paper, we consider OG and its broader implications for the future of public administration; we further propose a conceptual framework to guide policy makers in planning their open government programs.”
- Introduction to ‘Secrecy and Transparency’ (2011, background): “But more recently, transparency has become an interdisciplinary object of debate (see Garsten and Montoya, 2008; Hood and Heald, 2006; Lathrop and Ruma, 2010); its worth as a political and organizational strategy assiduously assessed by those in business studies (Flyverbom et al., 2011), public…”