Glycaemic index methodology
By F. Brouns, I. Björck, K. Frayn, A. Gibbs, V. Lang, G. Slama, T. Wolever. Nutrition research reviews, 2005
1,006 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae13fe6c900745c36ca0db53dbe75aa26161cf6d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
In Nutrition and Dietetics
Citations in the corpus
- Does wheat make us fat and sick (2013, background): “The statement above therefore misinterprets the background to the GI methodology (Brouns et al., 2005) as well as the related digestive and metabolic mechanisms.”
- Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: An International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). (2015, neutral): “The GI methodology is a suf fi ciently valid and reproducible method for differentiating foods based on their GR [49,204].”
- The bioavailability of an omega-3-rich algal oil is improved by nanoemulsion technology using yogurt as a food vehicle (2014, methodology): “212 Values were determined for each person during the intervention period according to the trapezoid 213 rule (Matthews et al. 1990, Brouns et al. 2005).”