ADHD Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation

By Danielle N. Pappas. 2006

1,786 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adbea2efe156c1926f4e42490dfa8113fe40dc35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Psychiatry and Mental health

Citations in the corpus

The World Health Organization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population (2005, methodology): “The first part was the semi-structured clinical ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS; DuPaul et al. 1998), a state-ofthe-art retrospective assessment of childhood A screening scale for adult ADHD 247”
Measuring attention deficit and activity in dogs: A new application and validation of a human ADHD questionnaire (2007, positive): “The questionnaire was developed on the basis of a validated human attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) questionnaire involving 18 items (ADHD RS Parent version, DuPaul, 1998).”
A neuroimaging investigation of the association between aerobic fitness, hippocampal volume, and memory performance in preadolescent children (2010, neutral): “…on three variables: child participation in a free or reduced-price lunch program at school, the highest level of education obtained by the child's mother and father, and the number of parents who worked full-time (Birnbaum et al., 2002). c Scores on the ADHD Rating Scale V (DuPaul et al., 1998).”
Multicultural Understanding of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology: Implications for Mental Health Assessment (2006, methodology): “However, acceptable alphas have been obtained for DSM-oriented scales on which respondents rate every symptom (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001; DuPaul et al., 1998; Gadow et al., 2002).”
Validity of pilot Adult ADHD Self- Report Scale (ASRS) to Rate Adult ADHD symptoms. (2006, methodology): “In order to allow comparisons between scales for ICC computations such that both measures would have similar 0–3 ranges, ASRS “0” (none) and “1” (rarely) were combined into a single category; this is similar to the scoring arrangement for frequency based “0–3” versions of the ADHD RS (0-“none”, 1-“s”
European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The European Network Adult ADHD (2010, methodology): “for screening include the ADHD Rating Scale, based on the DSM-IV criteria [214], and the six item World Health Organisation Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Symptom Checklist (online available without limitation and in many different languages at http:// www.”
The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. (2006, methodology): “2 (18, 19), a semi-structured interview that includes the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) (20) for childhood ADHD and an adaptation of the ADHD-RS to assess current adult ADHD.”
Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review (2010, methodology): “Shorter scales are usually less reliable compared to longer scales, which means they also tend to attenuate the validity (Streiner and Norman 1989).”